
Okay, so it's been, like, forever since I've posted anything new - if I thought you really cared, I'd apologize... but I find that notion extremely difficult to believe, so I shant waste my sincerity.
Suffice it to say, Leigh and I have been busier than any of you can possibly comprehend. I'll give the full report some other time when I'm not knee-deep in it, but trust me when I say that we are simply batshit insane.
Anyway...
I hope you all had a lovely holiday season (GOD I'm sick of the word 'holiday'... we're all just oh-so-sensitive... argh... that's another rant) and a happy new year.
A special, massive thanks to those of you who actually went online and bought 'BIRTHDAY WISHES'. It means a lot to us and we truly hope you enjoy the book. There will be at least one other John and Leigh collaboration coming out this year (possibly more) - so I'll keep ya posted.
But back to my topic for the day...
One of the Christmas presents Leigh got for me was the special edition 'Superman Returns' DVD... it was, in fact, something I asked for in spite of the fact that - as you may recall - I was not particularly thrilled with the movie. But the fact is, I have seen many movies and hated them upon first viewing and loved them upon the second viewing. Who knows why? I certainly can't explain it.
Another example of this phenomenon I can site was 'The Hulk'... I liked it okay the first time I saw it, but then I saw it again and came away thinking it was not only 'great' but at times it was downright brilliant. But, again, that's another topic for another time...
'Superman Returns'...
In a bunch of the behind-the-scenes footage, they talk a lot about how long it took them to get to make this movie... as many of you may or may not know, a 'Superman' movie had been in development at Warner Brothers for over a decade before this one finally came out. There was a version with Kevin Smith as the screenwriter, Tim Burton as the director, Nicholas Cage as Superman, etc. etc. etc. "So what?" I can almost hear you saying... but THINK about it... WB must have spent countless MILLIONS over the course of 10 years going around and around with how to re-invent the franchise, and after all that time and money what they finally got around to was an incarnation that was only slightly different from the movies with Christopher Reeves! What a waste of time, energy and resources. It's no wonder the movie industry is in such a slump... it took them ten years and all that money to come full circle. I'm sorry, but if you can't figure out that the way to make a buck off a movie with SUPERMAN in it, I just don't have any sympathy for you.
What breaks my heart about this movie is that it had such potential. The scene where he catches the falling jet in the middle of a baseball stadium? WONDERFUL! The movie is sprinkled with little moments that just make me ache for it to be a better movie. Unfortunately, there are just too many major flaws that get in the way of that.
Firstly, I would have enjoyed the film at least 40% more if it weren't for Kate Bosworth's awfulness. Lois Lane? Please.
Can somebody please stop casting these Kewpie-Doll-faced 'Dawson's Creek' rejects as reporters, scientists, doctors and what-not? Women like her become actresses on 'The O.C.' - they don't become hard-hitting newspaper journalists.
I'm not saying Lois Lane needs to be ugly... but c'mon... Bosworth looks like she's 19. Did she get her degree in journalism in grade-school?
Anyway...
One of the other themes that is effectively pounded into our heads is this notion of 'The Father becomes the Son and the Son becomes the -blah-blah-blah psychobabble bullshit". This kid from Krypton who becomes a hero was Clark Kent - Kansas farmboy LONG before he was Superman. He didn't spend his life wondering who his 'real' father was... his real father was Jonathan Kent. Superman is Clark's alter-ego... not the other way around. What makes Superman a great character is that he is NOT a Kryptonian demigod... he was just a regular small-town kid who discovered that he has special abilities.
The whole plot is that Superman went into space to try to find the remains of Krypton... why? Was he hoping is birthparents were still there?! He abandoned his friends, career, AGING MOTHER and post as superhero so that he could find: NOTHING!?
Superman wouldn't do that. He's not that selfish. Pa Kent taught him better than that.
Consequently, the other major plotpoint that makes me cringe every time I think about it is this hippie-haired little moppet as the Superman/Lois Lane love-child. I just don't know how to put into words how awful this is. It'll take too much time... but the fact of the matter is, NOTHING ruins an action movie more than the presence of some adorable little kid. Ugh.
Which brings me to my brilliant concept for the sequel that will fix most of these problems (unfortunately it looks like there's no getting rid of Bosworth)... in the next movie Lex Luthor should KILL SUPERMAN'S SON!
What better way to give Superman a whole new reason to hate Luthor? What better way to give his character more complexity? I mean, let's face it... Superman has never really suffered real LOSS before. In the first movie he 'almost' lost Lois, but he made time retract and saved her life... yeah, sure, Pa Kent died... but he basically died of a weak heart brought on by old age... okay, so he never knew his real parents or home planet, but how can you really feel loss for something you never had? But killing his only SON? Yowza! Now THAT'S dramatic! The crushing loss would make him realize his selfishness, remind him that Earth is his real home, and he would have a whole new motivation for being a hero.
Of course, they'd never do this in a million years 'cause Hollywood has gotten so chickenshit. We'll simply be subjected to several sequels with Superman and son flying around like Batman and Robin (from the 60's tv show) with several adorable scenes of little Jason learning to use his powers alongside his dad. Ugh. I need a Rolaids just thinking about it.
The final nail in the coffin that holds 'Superman Returns' is that I don't see ANYONE having any fun in it. They're all just kinda doing what they're told and everyone's taking it too seriously.
I truly think the key to success in ANY line of work whether it's plumbing, accounting or making movies is to somehow make the job fun. If everyone LIKES their job, they do better work. 'Superman Returns' has some fine talent in it... but they all seem so inhibited by the crushing weight of the responsibility of carrying this iconic movie that they're all stifled and there's no chemistry with any of the cast.
Oh well... I gave the movie another chance... I'm happy that I own it if for no other reason that I can watch the plane-cathing scene over and over again.
Take my advice, Warner Brothers... in the next movie: kill off that kid!

6 comments:
So long story short, Superman jumped the sharks? (By the way, it's TheSilverShell from YouTube!)
I loved Louie's rant around Superman Returns, and this is a nice addendum, almost cancelled out by the 'I Liked The Hulk', though. (in all fairness, I never saw The Hulk, mostly because so many people told me to avoid it).
We finally watched this movie the other night (yes, we're slow!) You forgot to mention Posey Parker. I love her as an actress but she was hideous in this movie! Truly, they could've switched Parker and Bosworth and then the casting would've been fine! But I thought Kevin Kline was phenomenal! I love his portrayal of the evil character...he does them so well.
Ah! Funny you should mention that, Mama... I've been saying from the VERY BEGINNING that Parker Posey should have played Lois Lane!
Everyone keeps telling me that Posey is 'too old' and that she would have looked much older than Bryan Singer (Superman) - but, frankly, I've watched the movie twice now and I don't think she looks that much older. Besides - they coulda made them up so that she looked a little younger and he looked a little older.
I did enjoy Kevin Spacey as well... he at least seemed to have SOME fun with his role.
And, Chris, I'm sorry - but you need to see 'The Hulk' before judging me for liking it.
There are LOTS of movies that you can judge without seeing them, but 'The Hulk' is not one of them. You may be surprised.
Anyway, thanks for the comments, kids.
Alright, so let's take the leap of faith that WB goes in the direction of killing the kid... I need to humor this a little. As much as it would definitely be a blow to Sup's, but I doubt this would a catalyst to hate Luthor more. The character has been yanked back and forth between two worlds... True one world does not truly exist anymore, yet the history of it has been given to him. Something like killing off his only son, that in itself could make for a good movie. Here we have an alien with this complete, upmost compassion for this humanity, and yet for all his good deeds, those same people take away his heir... I see Sup's gutting the whole world due to this newly created void. Some two hour epic of losing his own humanity, and the struggle to reclaim and redeem himself, and begin the process of moving on... but like you said, WB wouldn't do it because of the risk. Of course anyone should know that a sequel, beyond anything else, is always a risk.
She's not too old and she is gorgeous...and her brilliance as an actress would allow everyone to forget about any qualms they had in the first place. What I like is that she wouldn't have huffed and puffed around the set like an anorexic peahen. Sorry, I really DID NOT like Bosworth.
I'm glad we agree! And what happened to Leigh's blog? I just tried to get on but got rejected!
Post a Comment